

Schwieter (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and cognitive inquiries into translation and interpreting (pp.

Translation process research at the interface: Paradigmatic, theoretical, and methodological issues in dialogue with cognitive science, expertise studies, and psycholinguistics. Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process-oriented research. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 20(2), 233–239. Cronbach’s alpha: Review of limitations and associated recommendations.

The article concludes with a call for additional methodological reflection on developing and using survey instruments.Īgbo, A. The article begins with a reflection on measurement and the need for alignment with theoretical frameworks and constructs then it reviews important considerations when developing theoretically-grounded, empirically-based survey instruments, namely, validity, reliability, measurement invariance, and quantitative analysis. This article presents a critical review of survey research methods in Cognitive Translation Studies and argues for their inclusion as a means of better understanding translator and interpreter attitudes, behaviors, perceptions, and values. Survey, validity, reliability, measurement invariance, Cognitive Translation Studies AbstractĪs translation and interpreting studies continue to develop cognitive theories of translator and interpreter behavior and processing, there has been increased emphasis on research methods and data collection methodologies to glean new insights into the translation process. University of North Carolina at Charlotte
